SaaS Procurement Software · Procurement Intake Software
Omnea review
AI-native procurement platform from London that runs intake, approvals, sourcing, contracts, POs and supplier risk, with Slack and Teams request entry.
Omnea at a glance
- Starting price
- Contact sales
- Pricing model
- custom
- Public pricing
- No
- Free plan
- No
- Free trial
- No
- G2 rating
- 4.8 (60 reviews)
- Founded
- 2022
- Headquarters
- London, UK
- Employees
- 101-200
- Funding or owner
- Series B, $50M (September 2025), over $75M total
- Security
- SOC 2 Type II, GDPR
- Integrations
- 200+ (vendor claim): SAP, Conga, Slack, Microsoft Teams
Who Omnea is for
Choose Omnea if
- Mid-size and large companies with a lot of indirect spend and many stakeholders.
- Teams wanting employees to request purchases through Slack or Teams.
- Companies that want intake plus sourcing and supplier risk in one tool.
Look elsewhere if
- Small teams that need published prices or self-serve signup.
- Companies wanting a SaaS-inventory or license tracking tool.
Omnea pricing
Omnea does not publish a price list; pricing is quoted on request.
No pricing on vendor site; demo request only.
What Omnea really costs
- Billing
- Quote.
Omnea features by buying criteria
| Criterion | What we found |
|---|---|
| Software request intake | Unified and conversational intake via Slack, Teams and MCP. |
| Approval routing | Intake and approvals with configurable human oversight and audit trail; Context Engine learns from past approvals and rejections. |
| Negotiation / benchmarks | Autonomous Sourcing agent; vendor claims 4.2% average annual indirect savings. |
| ERP / finance / SSO integrations | Vendor claims 200+ integrations across ERPs, CLMs and GRCs; a G2 reviewer mentions SAP and Conga. |
| Pricing model | Quote only. |
| Request forms | Dynamic intake; configuration detail not published. |
| Workflow orchestration | Customizable workflow builder (G2 reviewers) |
| Slack / Teams entry | Slack, Teams, MCP. |
| AI triage | AI agents, Context Engine, supplier data from Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot. |
| ERP / P2P connectors | 200+ integrations claimed; ERPs not named on homepage. |
| Implementation time | Not stated by vendor; one G2 reviewer was live within a couple of weeks. |
| Pricing transparency | Quote only. |
What reviewers say about Omnea
Praised for
- Hands-on implementation team.
- Highly customizable workflow builder.
Common complaints
- Reviewers want more self-service integration setup.
Themes paraphrased from public reviews on G2 and similar sites, not quotes.
What most Omnea reviews leave out
- Vendor claims 45% faster intake-to-PO cycle times and 96% of spend through compliant channels; these are self-reported.
- Models run under zero data retention agreements and are not trained on customer data, per the vendor.
- Raised a $50M Series B in September 2025 led by Insight Partners and Khosla Ventures.
- Positions as full source-to-pay, but customers like Just Eat and Spotify named by vendor are enterprise-scale.
- Supplier data can be queried from Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot through MCP.
Omnea alternatives
ZipMid-market and enterprise teams routing all spend requests through one intake.Contact sales
TonkeanProcurement teams with Coupa, SAP or NetSuite who need an intake layer on top.Contact sales
LevelpathEnterprise procurement teams wanting intake and sourcing in one suite.Contact sales
SpendfloTeams with no dedicated procurement function (vendor's Grow tier target)Contact sales
ProcurifyMid-size companies that need PO and approval control tied to budgets.Contact sales
CoupaLarge enterprises that need one suite for procure-to-pay, sourcing and supplier risk.Contact sales
Omnea compared
Sources
Every fact on this page comes from Omnea's own pricing, product or documentation pages, G2 and company records, checked on October 24, 2026. Unknown values are left out instead of estimated.